III W 2/20
AI generated
Court imposes extraordinary lenient fine for failing to identify vehicle driver in written explanation.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court found the defendant guilty of failing to identify the vehicle driver in written explanations and imposed an extraordinary lenient fine. The defendant argued for exemption from costs, but the court ruled that the fine was appropriate given the circumstances. Consequently, the defendant was convicted and fined while being exempted from paying procedural costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 96 § 3 k.w. w zw. z art. 78 ust. 4 Ustawy Prawo o ruchu drogowym; Art. 39 § 1 i 2 k.w.: Failure to identify the driver in written explanations constitutes a traffic offense punishable by a fine, which may be imposed with extraordinary leniency.
Keywords
AI generated
failure to identify driver
written explanations
extraordinary leniency
traffic offense
fine imposition
procedural costs
vehicle ownership
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 96 § 3 Kodeksu Wykroczeń
Art. 78 ust. 4 Ustawy z dnia 20 czerwca 1997r. Prawo o ruchu drogowym
Art. 39 § 1 i 2 Kodeksu Wykroczeń