Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III K 356/20 AI generated

Court convicts defendant of fraud and recidivism, sentencing him to five years imprisonment and ordering restitution.

Case Number III K 356/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Regional Court in Warsaw-Mokotów convicted the defendant of fraud and recidivism for multiple instances of deceiving victims into transferring money under false pretenses. The prosecution argued that the defendant impersonated a prosecutor and police officer to commit these crimes within five years of a prior prison term. The court accepted the evidence, finding the defendant guilty on all counts and imposing a combined sentence of five years while ordering full restitution to the victims.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 286 § 1 k.k.; Art. 12 § 1 k.k.; Art. 64 § 1 k.k.; Art. 85 § 1 k.k.; Art. 86 § 1 k.k.; Art. 63 § 1 k.k.; Art. 46 § 1 k.k.; Art. 44 § 2 k.k.; Art. 230 § 2 k.p.k.; Art. 618 § 1 pkt 11 k.p.k.; Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.: The court established that impersonating a public official to defraud victims constitutes fraud, and that committing such crimes within five years of a prior prison term constitutes recidivism, warranting a combined sentence and full restitution.

Keywords

AI generated
fraudulent impersonation recidivism five years combined prison sentence civil restitution order criminal evidence admissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 286 § 1 k.k.
Art. 12 § 1 k.k.
Art. 64 § 1 k.k.
Art. 85 § 1 k.k.
Art. 86 § 1 k.k.
Art. 63 § 1 k.k.
Art. 46 § 1 k.k.
Art. 44 § 2 k.k.
Art. 230 § 2 k.p.k.
Art. 618 § 1 pkt 11 k.p.k.
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text