Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II K 938/19 AI generated

Court convicted defendant of drug possession under Art. 62 Narkomania Act despite contested facts.

Case Number II K 938/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court convicted the defendant of possessing controlled substances, finding the evidence sufficient to establish guilt. While the defendant claimed he did not possess the drugs, the court rejected this because his partial confession and the testimony of two officers corroborated the seizure of marijuana and amphetamines. The court applied Article 62 of the Drug Prevention Act, ruling that the defendant's actions met the legal definition of possession regardless of the disputed circumstances.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 62 ust. 1 ustawy o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii; Art. 157 k.p.k.: The court may convict a defendant based on partial confessions and corroborating witness testimony when the evidence sufficiently proves the possession of controlled substances, even if the defendant disputes the specific circumstances of the seizure.

Keywords

AI generated
possession of controlled substances partial confession corroborating witness testimony drug prevention act criminal conviction evidence evaluation contradictory statements

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 62 ust. 1 ustawy o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii
Art. 157 k.p.k.
art. 387 k.p.k
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text