II K 631/19
AI generated
Court convicts defendant of insult for offensive language used against police officers during arrest.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of insult for using offensive language against police officers during their arrest and transport. The prosecution argued that the defendant's verbal abuse, including derogatory terms, violated the dignity of state functionaries despite the victims claiming they were not personally offended. The court ruled that insult is a formal offense requiring no specific emotional impact on the recipient, and the defendant's admission of guilt confirmed the criminal act.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 189 k.k.; Insult is a formal offense where no specific consequence or feeling of humiliation by the addressee is required, and a defendant's admission of guilt establishes the criminal act.
Keywords
AI generated
insult formal offense
police officer dignity
alcohol intoxication
verbal abuse arrest
criminal conviction
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 189 k.k.
Art. 618 § 1 pkt. 11 k.p.k.
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 387 k.p.k
art. 226 § 1 k.k
art. 222 § 1 k.k
art. 224 § 2 k.k
art. 217 k.k
art. 156 k.k
art. 191 § 1 k.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedIV K 657/15
Court convicted defendants of insulting and assaulting police officers, imposing daily fines and compensation.
II K 8/17
Court convicted defendant of assaulting police officer with mitigating circumstances and suspended sentence.
VI K 292/12
Court convicts recidivist for insulting and assaulting police officers, imposing combined prison sentence.
II K 48/16
Court convicted defendant of insulting and assaulting police officers, sentencing him to five months of restricted liberty with community service.