Court convicted defendant of robbery but applied lesser offense due to low malice and lack of provocation.

The court convicted the defendant of robbery but applied the lesser offense of a minor crime. Facts show the defendant initiated a physical altercation to extend money, resulting in minor injuries and temporary loss of consciousness for a victim. The court rejected the defense's argument that the act lacked criminal character, noting the defendant's intent to enrich himself and the absence of provocation, while acknowledging mitigating factors only affected sentencing.