Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
XVI GC 5082/19 AI generated

Postal operator's claim for unpaid services barred by general statute of limitations, not postal law.

Case Number XVI GC 5082/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the postal operator's claim for unpaid services, ruling that the general Civil Code statute of limitations applies rather than the specific Postal Law provision. The operator argued for a shorter limitation period under the Postal Law, but the court found no specific rule extending or shortening the general period for this type of claim. Consequently, the court applied the standard five-year limitation period under the Civil Code, which had expired by the time of the lawsuit.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 93 ust. 2 ustawy Prawo pocztowe; Art. 118 k.c.: The general statute of limitations provisions of the Civil Code apply to claims for postal service remuneration unless a specific provision in the Postal Law governs the limitation period.

Keywords

AI generated
statute of limitations postal law Civil Code remuneration claim limitation period postal services procedural bar

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 93 ust. 2 of the Postal Law
Do przedawnienia roszczeń operatora pocztowego o zapłatę wynagrodzenia za usługi pocztowe nie znajduje zastosowania art. 93 ust.
Art. 118 of the Civil Code
2 ustawy Prawo pocztowe, lecz art. 118 kc;

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Do przedawnienia roszczeń operatora pocztowego o zapłatę wynagrodzenia za usługi pocztowe nie znajduje zastosowania art. 93 ust. 2 ustawy Prawo pocztowe, lecz art. 118 kc;