Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
XVI GC 5082/19 AI generated

Postal operator's claim for unpaid services barred by general limitation period, not postal law.

Case Number XVI GC 5082/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the postal operator's claim for unpaid services, ruling that the general limitation period applies rather than a specific postal law provision. The operator argued for a shorter limitation period under postal regulations, while the defendant contended the standard civil code rules governed the debt. The court held that no special limitation rules exist for postal service payments, applying the general statute of limitations instead.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 93 ust. 2 ustawy Prawo pocztowe; Art. 118 k.c.: The general limitation period under the Civil Code applies to claims for postal service remuneration, excluding the specific provision of the Postal Law.

Keywords

AI generated
postal service limitation general limitation period Civil Code Art 118 Postal Law Art 93 unpaid service claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 93 ust. 2 ustawy Prawo pocztowe
Do przedawnienia roszczeń operatora pocztowego o zapłatę wynagrodzenia za usługi pocztowe nie znajduje zastosowania art. 93 ust. 2 ustawy Prawo pocztowe, lecz art.
Art. 118 Kodeks cywilny
2 ustawy Prawo pocztowe, lecz art. 118 kc;

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Do przedawnienia roszczeń operatora pocztowego o zapłatę wynagrodzenia za usługi pocztowe nie znajduje zastosowania art. 93 ust. 2 ustawy Prawo pocztowe, lecz art. 118 kc;