Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VIII Pa 95/20 AI generated

Appeal dismissed for lack of interest; court rejected valid claims and altered minor parts of the first instance judgment.

Case Number VIII Pa 95/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the appeal regarding valid grounds while rejecting the claim of lack of interest in the appeal. The appellant argued that the first instance judgment contained errors, but the court found no merit in these substantive complaints. Consequently, the appeal was rejected on the merits, and the first instance ruling was modified only to the extent necessary to address minor discrepancies.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 373 § 1 k.p.c.; art. 385 k.p.c.; art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: An appeal is dismissed if the appellant lacks interest in the appeal, and the court may modify the first instance judgment only to the extent required to correct minor errors or inconsistencies.

Keywords

AI generated
lack of interest in appeal dismissal of appeal modification of judgment procedural error correction appellant's rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 373 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 385 k.p.c.
art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

brak interesu w zaskarżeniu uwzględnionego powództwa powoduje odrzucenie apelacji w zakresie trafnych zarzutów apelacyjnych.Sąd zmienił zaskarżony wyrok w zakresie nieistotnych oddalił apelację,.Podstawa prawna orzeczenia : art 373 Par.1 kpc art 386 par.1 kpc art 385 kpc