Court increases life sentence for one defendant and 25 years for others due to procedural errors.

The Court of Appeal partially overturned the first-instance judgment, increasing K. Ł.'s sentence to life imprisonment while maintaining 25-year sentences for P. K. and P. G. The defense argued that the lower court's sentencing was procedurally flawed and disproportionately harsh, citing errors in the application of the law. The appellate court found that the original sentencing violated the principle of proportionality and procedural fairness, necessitating an increase in the penalty for the most culpable defendant while upholding the others' terms.