Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I C 474/20 AI generated

Court dismisses claim for expert opinion when plaintiff professionally assesses vehicle damage and knows the value.

Case Number I C 474/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiff's request for a court-appointed expert opinion regarding vehicle damage valuation. The plaintiff, who works professionally in liquidating vehicle damages, already possesses the necessary knowledge to assess the claim's value. Consequently, the court ruled that an expert opinion is not required given the plaintiff's professional expertise.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Civil Code provisions on burden of proof; When a party possesses professional knowledge regarding damage valuation, a court-appointed expert opinion is not necessary to establish the claim's value.

Keywords

AI generated
professional knowledge vehicle damage expert opinion burden of proof civil procedure claim valuation liquidation of damages

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

W sytuacji, gdy powód zajmuje się zawodowo likwidacją szkód w pojazdach ma zatem wiedzę o wycenie takiej szkody, nie potrzebna jest mu opinia rzeczoznawcy, by wycenić wysokość roszczenia zgłoszonego do Sądu