Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 71/21 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance conviction for theft under Art. 107 § 3 kks.

Case Number II Ka 71/21
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defense's appeal against the first-instance conviction for theft. The defense argued procedural errors and factual inaccuracies under Articles 438(2) and (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, claiming the evidence was insufficient or the facts were wrongly established. The court rejected these claims, finding no impact on the trial's outcome and upholding the original judgment which found the defendant guilty of theft.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 2, 3 k.p.k.; Art. 634 k.p.k.; Art. 627 k.p.k.; The court held that procedural errors or factual mistakes not affecting the substance of the judgment do not warrant an appeal decision.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal procedure theft conviction procedural error review factual findings review dismissal of appeal Criminal Procedure Code costs of proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 634 k.p.k.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
Art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 3 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
Art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 437 § 2 k.p.k
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text