Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 72/21 AI generated

Court dismissed defense appeal against sentence for dangerous driving, upholding first instance ruling on facts and penalty.

Case Number II Ka 72/21
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the defense's appeal against the first-instance judgment convicting the defendant of dangerous driving. The defense argued for a change in the sentence, but the court found no errors in the factual findings or legal qualification. Consequently, the original verdict was upheld in its entirety, and the defendant was ordered to pay court costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 2, 3, 4 k.p.k.; Art. 634 k.p.k. w zw. z art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; The appellate court's duty is to verify if the first-instance judgment contains procedural errors or factual mistakes that could have influenced the outcome; if none are found, the judgment stands.

Keywords

AI generated
dangerous driving appellate review procedural error factual findings court costs sentence upholding defense appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 634 kpk w zw. z art. 636 § 1 kpk w zw. z art. 627 kpk
art. 8 w zw. z art. 2 ust. 3 i art. 3 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 437 § 2 k.p.k
art. 454 § 1 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text