II K 782/20
AI generated
Court combined sentences for concurrent crimes but dismissed the third verdict due to completed execution.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court combined the sentences for two prior convictions into a total of two years and two months imprisonment. It dismissed the proceedings regarding a third conviction because the sentence for that offense had already been fully executed. The decision applied the principle of full cumulation to ensure the defendant faced appropriate punishment for distinct crimes.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 569 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 85 § 1 k.k.; Art. 86 § 1 k.k.: When combining sentences, if a sentence from a prior judgment has already been fully executed, the proceedings regarding that specific sentence must be dismissed.
Keywords
AI generated
combined sentences
full cumulation
execution completed
dismissal proceedings
concurrent crimes
prison term
criminal law
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 569 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 85 § 1 k.k.
Art. 86 § 1 k.k.
Art. 572 k.p.k.
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
Related Decisions
AI generatedXII K 148/21
Court rejects full absorption of sentences for multiple crimes, applying partial absorption instead.
VI Ka 633/24
Appeal against combined sentence dismissed; court upheld original verdict regarding sentencing and procedural errors.
VI Ka 778/23
Appeal dismissed; combined sentence upheld as most favorable law applied correctly by first instance court.
II K 292/25
Joint sentence combines driving ban and fine; Supreme Court rules fines cannot be cumulated due to lack of temporal character.