II K 1029/19
AI generated
Court combined multiple prison sentences for a repeat offender, applying the principle of asperation to set a total term of 9 years and 6 months.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court combined three specific prison sentences into a single total term of 9 years and 6 months for the defendant. While the defendant had already served time from previous convictions, the court noted his negative local reputation and history of reoffending despite prior punishments. The decision applied the principle of asperation to ensure the combined sentence met the goals of individual and general prevention.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 85 § 1, 2, 3 k.k.; Art. 86 § 1 k.k.; Art. 4 § 1 k.k.; Art. 63 § 1 k.k.; Art. 572 k.p.k.: When multiple prison sentences are imposed, the court must combine them into a single term, applying the principle of asperation to balance the severity of the new crimes against the time already served.
Keywords
AI generated
combination of sentences
principle of asperation
repeated offenses
prison term calculation
criminal law provisions
procedural execution
repeat offender
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 85 § 1, 2, 3 k.k.
Art. 86 § 1 k.k.
Art. 4 § 1 k.k.
Art. 63 § 1 k.k.
Art. 572 k.p.k.
Art. 575 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 618 § 1 pkt. 11 k.p.k.
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 86 § 1 k.k
art. 4 § 1 k.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedII Ka 271/23
Court quashes criminal verdict for procedural error under Art. 454 § 1 K.P.K. and remands case for retrial.
II Ka 600/20
Court allows appeal to add a back-kick fact, rejecting multiple-kick claim due to lack of prior accusation.
IV Ka 1275/21
Appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction and penalty against company director for bankruptcy-related crimes.
VI Ka 291/23
Court of Appeal quashes lower court verdict due to lack of jurisdiction and remands case for retrial.
II AKa 251/20
Appeal court corrects drug offense sentencing by changing legal basis and reducing sentence to two years.