Final judgment required to invalidate prior unlawful resolutions retroactively; interim court cannot assess validity.

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim, ruling that only a final judgment can invalidate prior resolutions with retroactive effect. The plaintiff argued that the defendant's resolutions were unlawful, but the court noted that until a final decision exists, the legal consequences of those resolutions remain binding. Consequently, the court held it lacks authority to independently assess the validity of resolutions unrelated to the current proceedings for the purpose of securing the lawsuit.