I ACa 976/18
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal, holding that lower court's sentence was correct and no new facts justified reversal.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the first-instance judgment, confirming the validity of the original sentence. The appellant argued for a different outcome based on specific circumstances, but the court found no material errors in the lower court's reasoning. Consequently, the decision upholds the initial ruling as legally sound and factually accurate.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.; Art. 386 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.: The Supreme Court may revoke a judgment only if it finds a violation of the law or a failure to consider relevant facts, and in this instance, the lower court's application of the law was correct.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal appeal
Supreme Court review
sentence validity
procedural error
factual assessment
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.
Art. 386 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.
Cited Case Law
AI generatedFull text
jak w uchwale SN wydanej w tej sprawie z dnia 6 sierpnia 2020 III CZP 76/19