VI Ka 122/20 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal on procedural grounds, upholding first-instance conviction for assault under Polish Criminal Code.

Case Number VI Ka 122/20

Court / Authority Sąd powszechny

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2020-11-27

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's appeal, upholding the first-instance conviction for assault under Article 207 of the Criminal Code. The defense argued procedural errors under Article 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, but the court found no grounds to alter the judgment. Consequently, the defendant was ordered to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings to the state and the private prosecutor.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; § 11 ust. 2 pkt 4 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 października 2015 r.: An appeal is rejected when the first-instance judgment is legally sound and the appeal does not reveal errors affecting the outcome.

Keywords

AI generated

Criminal Procedure Code Appeal Dismissal Assault Conviction Procedural Error Costs of Proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.

§ 11 ust. 2 pkt 4 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 października 2015 r. w sprawie opłat za czynności adwokackie

Art. 626 § 1 k.p.k.

Art. 634 k.p.k.

Art. 8 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach sądowych

§ 1 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 18 czerwca 2003 r. w sprawie wysokości i sposobu obliczania wydatków Skarbu Państwa w postępowaniu karnym

art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k

AI generated

IX Ka 379/20

Court partially allowed appeal, acquitting defendants of one charge and reducing sentences for joint crime.

VI Ka 178/20

Criminal appeal court reduced civil compensation liability for the defendant due to financial hardship.

VI Ka 468/25

Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance conviction for attempted theft and rejected defense arguments regarding procedural errors and factual mistakes.

VI Ka 552/23