Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II K 437/18 AI generated

Court convicted defendant of drunk driving and theft, applying recidivism due to prior conviction for similar offense.

Case Number II K 437/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court convicted the defendant of theft and driving under the influence, finding the evidence sufficient to prove the elements of both crimes. The prosecution argued that the defendant's prior conviction for a similar offense constituted recidivism, which should aggravate the punishment. The court accepted this argument, ruling that the defendant's previous sentence for driving under the influence within the relevant timeframe legally established the condition of recidivism.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 178a § 1, 4 k.k.; Art. 280 § 2 k.k.; The court established that a prior conviction for driving under the influence within the statutory period constitutes recidivism, requiring a heavier penalty for the new offense of drunk driving.

Keywords

AI generated
drunk driving conviction theft of vehicle recidivism aggravation prior conviction effect alcohol limit threshold criminal liability sentencing guidelines

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 178a § 1 k.k.
Art. 178a § 4 k.k.
Art. 280 § 2 k.k.
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 387 k.p.k
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text