Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III RC 446/13 AI generated

Family court dismisses alimentary claim against non-resident defendant due to lack of jurisdiction and insufficient evidence of need.

Case Number III RC 446/13
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The family court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for alimony against the defendant, ruling that the court lacked jurisdiction over the non-resident party. The plaintiff argued for support based on the child's needs, while the defendant contested the claim citing lack of financial obligation. The court rejected the request because the necessary conditions for establishing a support obligation were not met under the applicable law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o alimentach; Ustawa o postępowaniu w sprawach rodzinnych: The court lacks jurisdiction to rule on alimony claims against non-resident defendants unless specific conditions are met, and a claim is dismissed if the plaintiff fails to prove the existence of a support obligation.

Keywords

AI generated
alimony claim dismissal family court jurisdiction non-resident defendant support obligation proof family law procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ustawa o alimentach
Ustawa o postępowaniu w sprawach rodzinnych

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III RC 446/13 WYROK W IMIENIU RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ Dnia 10 marca 2014 r. Sąd Rejonowy w Grodzisku Mazowieckim Wydział III Rodzinny i Nieletnich w składzie: Przewodniczący SSR Grażyna Ogonowska Protokolant Monika Jarkiewicz po rozpoznaniu w dniu 10 marca 2014r., w G. na rozprawie sprawy z powództwa M. W. (1) przeciwko M. W. (2) o alimenty 1. powództwo oddala; 2. koszty postępowania przejmuje na rachunek Skarbu Państwa. SSR Grażyna Ogonowska Na oryginale właściwy podpis