VI Ka 172/20
AI generated
Appeal dismissed; defense lawyer's appeal against conviction upheld; court ruled on procedural errors and factual findings.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court dismissed the defense lawyer's appeal, upholding the first-instance conviction for the defendant. The defense argued procedural violations and factual errors under articles 438(2) and 438(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, while the prosecution maintained the original judgment's validity. The court found no merit in these claims, rejecting the arguments regarding procedural flaws and factual inaccuracies that could have influenced the verdict.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 ust. 2, 3 k.p.k.; Art. 29 ust. 1 Prawo o adwokaturze; The appellate court must rigorously examine procedural and factual errors alleged by the defense, dismissing appeals where the first-instance judgment remains legally sound and factually accurate.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal appeal procedure
procedural error review
factual finding error
defense lawyer appeal
conviction upheld
costs of defense
appellate court jurisdiction
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 438 ust. 2 k.p.k.
art. 438 ust. 3 k.p.k.
art. 29 ust. 1 Prawo o adwokaturze
§ 17 ust. 2 pkt 4 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 3 października 2016 r.
art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 634 k.p.k.
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedII AKa 289/23
Appeal court upheld conviction for attempted murder and assault, rejecting defense's factual error claims.
II Ka 247/23
Appeal dismissed; defense lawyer's request for sentence reduction rejected due to lack of gross disproportionality.
II AKa 147/22
Appeal dismissed; factual errors regarding 2009 funds withdrawal agreement did not affect conviction outcome.
II Ka 279/24
Appeal dismissed; lower court's sentence upheld as not grossly disproportionate under Polish Criminal Procedure Code.
VI Ka 269/22
Court partially allowed appeal by reclassifying crime and reducing sentence due to new evidence on asset misappropriation amount.