Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VI Ka 172/20 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; defense lawyer's appeal against conviction upheld; court ruled on procedural errors and factual findings.

Case Number VI Ka 172/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the defense lawyer's appeal, upholding the first-instance conviction for the defendant. The defense argued procedural violations and factual errors under articles 438(2) and 438(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, while the prosecution maintained the original judgment's validity. The court found no merit in these claims, rejecting the arguments regarding procedural flaws and factual inaccuracies that could have influenced the verdict.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 ust. 2, 3 k.p.k.; Art. 29 ust. 1 Prawo o adwokaturze; The appellate court must rigorously examine procedural and factual errors alleged by the defense, dismissing appeals where the first-instance judgment remains legally sound and factually accurate.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal procedure procedural error review factual finding error defense lawyer appeal conviction upheld costs of defense appellate court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 438 ust. 2 k.p.k.
art. 438 ust. 3 k.p.k.
art. 29 ust. 1 Prawo o adwokaturze
§ 17 ust. 2 pkt 4 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 3 października 2016 r.
art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 634 k.p.k.
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text