Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
XXV C 939/19 AI generated

Court dismisses plaintiff's request for security measure against bank due to lack of urgency and insufficient evidence of irreparable harm.

Case Number XXV C 939/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiffs' request for a security measure against the bank. The plaintiffs argued they needed immediate financial protection due to alleged account issues, but failed to demonstrate sufficient urgency or irreparable harm. Consequently, the court ruled that the legal requirements for granting such a precautionary measure were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 481 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 482 § 1 k.p.c.: A security measure may be granted only if there is a risk of irreparable harm and the circumstances indicate urgency, which must be substantiated by concrete evidence.

Keywords

AI generated
security measure precautionary relief irreparable harm urgency requirement bank dispute civil procedure dismissal of request

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 481 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 482 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt XXV C 939/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 10 sierpnia 2020 r. Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie XXV Wydział Cywilny w składzie następującym: Przewodniczący: Sędzia Sądu Okręgowego Paweł Duda po rozpoznaniu w dniu 10 sierpnia 2020 r. w Warszawie na posiedzeniu niejawnym sprawy z powództwa A. W. (1), A. W. (2), W. W., B. W. przeciwko (...) Bankowi S.A. z siedzibą w W. o ustalenie i zapłatę postanawia: oddalić wniosek powodów o udzielnie zabezpieczenia. ZARZĄDZENIE (...) 10.08.2020 r.