Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II W 260/19 AI generated

Court convicts defendant of multiple minor offenses for jaywalking, throwing apples, and insulting police, imposing a 500 PLN fine.

Case Number II W 260/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court convicted the defendant of five distinct offenses including jaywalking, throwing objects at a vehicle, littering, using vulgar language, and refusing identification. The prosecution argued that the defendant's behavior was a deliberate provocation, while the defense claimed self-defense against police officers who allegedly beat them. The court rejected the defense's account as contradictory to witness testimony and found the defendant's actions to be a reckless breach of social norms.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 97, 76, 145, 141, 65§2 Kodeksu wykroczeń; The court established that when witness testimony regarding a defendant's conduct is consistent, credible, and corroborated by the defendant's own partial admissions, the defendant's contradictory statements regarding self-defense or innocence must be rejected as unreliable.

Keywords

AI generated
Code of Offenses jaywalking conviction littering offense vulgar language refusal of identification witness credibility fine imposition

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 97 Kodeksu wykroczeń
Art. 76 Kodeksu wykroczeń
Art. 145 Kodeksu wykroczeń
Art. 141 Kodeksu wykroczeń
Art. 65 § 2 Kodeksu wykroczeń
Art. 9 § 2 Kodeksu wykroczeń
Art. 24 § 1 Kodeksu wykroczeń
Art. 24 § 3 Kodeksu wykroczeń
Art. 119 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania karnego

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text