I Ca 36/20
AI generated
Claim dismissed because alimentary obligation change requires post-judgment relationship change under Art. 138 krio.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for a change in alimentary obligations. The plaintiff argued that new circumstances justified a modification, but the court held that Article 138 of the Civil Code requires a change in the legal relationship occurring after the final judgment. Consequently, the claim was rejected as it did not meet the statutory prerequisite for such a modification.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 138 k.c.; A claim for modification of alimentary obligations based on changed circumstances is admissible only if the change in the legal relationship occurred after the final judgment became effective.
Keywords
AI generated
alimentary obligations
change of circumstances
final judgment
post-judgment modification
civil code article 138
family law
legal relationship change
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 138 k.c.
Podstawę powództwa z art. 138 krio może być tylko zmiana stosunków zaistniała po uprawomocnieniu się wyroku zasądzającego alimenty.
Full text
Podstawę powództwa z art. 138 krio może być tylko zmiana stosunków zaistniała po uprawomocnieniu się wyroku zasądzającego alimenty.