II Ka 612/20
AI generated
Criminal appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance sentence for theft and fraud due to lack of factual errors.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance judgment convicting him of theft and fraud. The defense argued for a change in the sentence citing disproportionate punishment, but the court found no factual errors or procedural flaws affecting the verdict. Consequently, the original sentence was upheld, and the defendant was ordered to pay the appeal costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.; Art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k.: An appeal based on alleged factual errors or disproportionate sentencing is rejected when the appellate court finds no such errors in the established facts or the proportionality of the imposed penalty.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal appeal
proportionality of sentence
factual errors
theft and fraud
appeal costs
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 286 § 1 k.k.
art. 244 k.k.
art. 286 § 3 kk
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k.
art. 634 kpk
art. 627 kpk
art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 3 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 286 § 1 k.k
art. 244 k.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedII K 454/20
W dniu 5 listopada 2016 roku w S.
II Ka 597/23
Criminal appeal dismissed; court upheld lower court's partial acquittal and imposed costs on the defendant.
VI Ka 423/21
Wyrok Sądu Rejonowego dla Warszawy Pragi-Południe w Warszawie z dnia 2 grudnia 2020r., sygn.
II Ka 361/24
Wyrok Sądu Rejonowego w Koninie z dnia 10 października 2024 r., sygn.
IV Ka 346/21
Appeal partially allowed: Appeal against sentence length granted, but other appeals dismissed.