Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II Ka 492/20 AI generated

Appeal court upholds first-instance sentence and orders defendants to pay court fees and costs.

Case Number II Ka 492/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal upheld the first-instance judgment against the defendants regarding the conviction under Article 158 of the Criminal Code. The defendants appealed, arguing procedural errors and excessive penalties, but the court found no grounds to alter the substantive ruling. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed in part, while the court ordered the defendants to pay the state court fees and litigation costs as established by the lower court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.; Art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.; Art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k.: The appellate court reviews the first-instance judgment for procedural errors affecting the verdict, factual mistakes influencing the decision, and gross disproportionality in sentencing, upholding the original ruling if these grounds are not substantiated.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal procedure procedural error review factual finding error gross disproportionality of penalty court fees and costs upholding first instance judgment defense appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.
Art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.
Art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k.
Art. 634 k.p.k.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
Ustawa z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
AI generated
X Ka 844/23
Court partially allowed appeal to remove UK company liability from copyright infringement conviction.
II Ka 252/25
Court dismissed defense appeal regarding free legal aid costs, upholding first instance verdict on evidence evaluation.
II Ka 573/23
Appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction for aggravated theft and procedural errors as non-prejudicial.
IV Ka 438/22
Appellate court upholds first-instance conviction for theft, rejecting defense's claim of lack of intent to appropriate.
II Ka 459/24
Court partially allows appeal to reduce damages and correct stolen goods value description.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text