II Ka 345/20
AI generated
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance sentence for attempted harm and procedural violations.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the appeals filed by the defendants against the first-instance judgment. The court found the defendants guilty of attempted harm and upheld the original sentencing while rejecting their arguments regarding legal qualification and factual errors. Consequently, the first-instance verdict was maintained in full, and court costs were assigned to the defendants.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 k.p.k.; Art. 634 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 627 k.p.k.; The court rejected appeals based on alleged errors in legal qualification, factual findings, or sentencing disproportionality when the first-instance judgment remains substantively correct and no new circumstances warrant consideration.
Keywords
AI generated
attempted harm
criminal appeal
legal qualification error
factual findings error
sentencing disproportionality
court costs
upholding verdict
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 438 k.p.k.
Art. 634 k.p.k.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 4 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedII AKa 311/20
Court partially allowed appeal by changing drug offense charges from probation to standard sentencing under Criminal Code.
VI Ka 1045/21
Court of Appeal quashes lower court verdict due to factual errors and remands case for retrial.
IX Ka 1300/25
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first instance verdict rejecting defense's procedural and factual error claims.
II AKa 162/23
Court reduces life sentence to 14 years for attempted murder, finding indirect intent due to procedural errors.
II AKa 24/20
Court of Appeal convicted defendant of robbery planning and robbery, increasing sentence due to prior record.