II K 52/20
AI generated
Court imposes one-year driving ban and fine for drunk driving with admitted guilt.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court found the defendant guilty of drunk driving based on breathalyzer readings exceeding the legal limit and his confession. It imposed a one-year ban on operating mechanical vehicles and a monetary fine to the victim assistance fund. The decision relied on the statutory requirements for administrative penalties and the principle of proportionality in sentencing.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 178a § 1 k.k.; Art. 67 § 3 k.k.; Art. 39 pkt. 3 k.k.; Art. 63 § 4 k.k.; Art. 627 k.p.k.; Art. 7 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych. The court established that when a defendant admits guilt and facts are clear, the court must impose appropriate administrative sanctions like driving bans and fines to fulfill preventive and educational functions.
Keywords
AI generated
drunk driving offense
driving ban sanction
monetary fine penalty
admission of guilt
proportionality principle
administrative penalty
breathalyzer evidence
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 178a § 1 k.k.
Art. 67 § 3 k.k.
Art. 39 pkt. 3 k.k.
Art. 63 § 4 k.k.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
Art. 7 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 387 k.p.k
art. 67 § 1 k.k
art. 66 § 1 k.k
art. 66 k.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedpostanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 27 listopada 2003 r., I KK 301/03, OSNKW 2004, nr 1, poz. 9
I KK 301/03
Related Decisions
AI generatedII K 26/21
Court convicts driver for drunk driving, imposing fine, license ban, and compensation.
II K 888/19
Court convicted defendant of drunk driving, imposing suspended sentence and vehicle ban due to confession and remorse.
II K 353/16
Court convicts drunk driver of minor offense, imposing fine, license ban, and victim compensation.
II K 253/19
Court grants conditional probation for drunk driving with low alcohol levels and early morning location.