Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III K 278/20 AI generated

Court dismisses joint sentence request because one suspended sentence's probation period expired, making it ineligible for combination.

Case Number III K 278/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the defendant's request to issue a joint sentence by combining two prior convictions. The defendant argued for absorption of penalties, but the court found that one sentence for drug offenses had been fully executed while the other for theft had its probation period expired. Consequently, the conditions required to combine these penalties under the Criminal Code were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 570 k.p.k.; Art. 75 § 4 k.k.; Art. 76 § 1 k.k.: A suspended sentence ceases to be combinable for a joint sentence once the probation period expires, as it no longer falls under the category of penalties subject to execution.

Keywords

AI generated
joint sentence suspended sentence probation period penalty combination criminal code execution of penalty absorption of penalties

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 572 k.p.k. w zw. z art. 85 a contrario k.k.
art. 4 § 1 k.k.
art. 19 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 20 lutego 2015r. o zmianie ustawy – Kodeks karny
art. 81 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 19 czerwca 2020 roku o dopłatach do oprocentowania kredytów bankowych
art. 632 pkt 2 k.p.k.
art. 626 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 572 k.p.k
art. 4 § 1 k.k
art. 632 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 626 § 1 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text