II Ka 204/20
AI generated
Criminal appeal dismissed; drunk driving conviction upheld due to lack of procedural errors affecting the verdict.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance conviction for drunk driving. The defendant argued procedural violations under the Code of Criminal Procedure, but the court found these claims unfounded. Consequently, the original sentence was upheld, and the defendant was ordered to pay court costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 k.p.k.; Art. 634 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 627 k.p.k.; Art. 3 ust. 1 3 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych; The appeal is inadmissible if the alleged procedural errors did not influence the substance of the judgment.
Keywords
AI generated
drunk driving conviction
criminal appeal dismissal
procedural error review
Code of Criminal Procedure
court costs award
unfounded appeal
traffic offense
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 634 k.p.k.
art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 627 k.p.k.
art. 3 ust. 1 3 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 437 § 2 k.p.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedII K 64/25
Court convicts drunk driver of dangerous driving, sentencing to community service and lifetime driving ban.
II K 1271/23
Court convicted drunk driver of 10 years driving ban due to recidivism and exceptional circumstances under Polish Criminal Code.
II K 422/24
Court dismissed confiscation of car due to lack of exceptional circumstances and proportionality violation.
II K 699/21
Jeżeli wniosek o uzasadnienie wyroku dotyczy tylko niektórych czynów lub niektórych oskarżonych, sąd może ograniczyć uzasadnienie do części wyroku objętych wnioskiem.
II K 106/22
Court convicts defendant of drunk driving under Art. 178a §1kk k.k. and imposes license ban.