III Kow 1300/18
AI generated
Court dismissed prisoner's appeal regarding prison award denial, upholding administrative decision based on prior ruling.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the prisoner's appeal against the prison commission's negative opinion on award eligibility. The prisoner argued the decision was arbitrary and made without consultation, claiming he did not understand the commission's purpose. The court ruled that the decision was legally sound, properly reasoned, and consistent with a previously upheld administrative ruling, thus rejecting the appeal as merely a dispute with the administration's established facts.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 138 § 1 pkt 7 i 8 k.k.w.; Art. 7 § 5 kkw. The court's review of a prisoner's appeal against a prison commission's decision on award eligibility is limited to verifying legal compliance and consistency with prior rulings, not re-evaluating the administrative facts.
Keywords
AI generated
prison award eligibility
prison commission decision
administrative appeal
penitentiary law
prior ruling consistency
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 138 § 1 pkt 7 i 8 k.k.w.
Art. 7 § 5 kkw.
Related Decisions
AI generatedIII K 123/23
Court combines multiple drug-related prison sentences into a single total sentence due to recidivism.
II Kow 111/21
19.01.2021 roku Sędzia Penitencjarny po raz kolejny pozostawił wniosek skazanego G.
II AKa 306/23
Appellate court reduced combined sentence by applying more favorable 2020 probation rules to prior terms.
I C 786/19
Powód M. B. domagał się zasądzenia od pozwanego Skarbu Państwa Dyrektora Zakładu Karnego w S. 75.000 zł tytułem zadośćuczynienia Uzasadniając swe żądanie wskazał, że pozwany naruszył jego dobra osobiste dwukrotnie odmawiając wpisania na listy odwiedzających bliskich mu osób.