II Ka 343/20
AI generated
Appeal against conviction for abuse of power dismissed; procedural errors and factual findings upheld by appellate court.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court dismissed the appeal filed by the prosecutor and the victim's representative against the first-instance conviction for abuse of power. The court found no error in the material facts, including the victim's abuse and the recording of the incident, nor in the procedural application of the law. Consequently, the original judgment was upheld in full, and the state was ordered to cover the defense costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 pkt 2, 3 k.p.k.; Art. 634, 636 § 1 k.p.k.; The appellate court rejects appeals alleging procedural errors or factual mistakes when the lower court's findings are supported by evidence and do not affect the judgment's substance.
Keywords
AI generated
abuse of power
criminal appeal
procedural error
factual findings
defense costs
upholding judgment
public prosecutor
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.
Art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.
Art. 634 k.p.k.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
§ 11 ust. 2 pkt 4 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 października 2015 r. w sprawie opłat za czynności radców prawnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedIV Ka 500/25
Appeal dismissed; defendant exempted from court costs due to poverty while state pays defense lawyer fees.
II Ka 252/22
Criminal appeal court revoked probation suspension due to procedural error requiring simultaneous ruling on supervision and fine.
IV Ka 563/20
Appeal court modified sentence to add probation reporting duty and upheld remaining conviction for assault.
IV Ka 350/24
Court dismisses prosecutor's appeal on factual error, finding no bias in judge's delegation history.
II AKa 31/25
Appeal court partially allowed appeal, increasing damages and interest while dismissing excess compensation claims.