Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
IX C 1204/19 AI generated

Court dismisses request to extend deadline solely because defendant received incorrect mailing date.

Case Number IX C 1204/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court rejected the plaintiff's request to restore the procedural deadline. The plaintiff argued that the defendant received the correspondence with an incorrect date, but the court found no other extraordinary circumstances preventing timely action. Consequently, the error in the mailing date alone was insufficient to justify extending the deadline.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o postępowaniu cywilnym; Art. 109 § 1 k.p.c.: The mere receipt of correspondence with an incorrect date does not justify extending a procedural deadline absent other extraordinary circumstances preventing timely performance.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural deadline restoration incorrect mailing date extraordinary circumstances civil procedure law time limit extension

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ustawa o postępowaniu cywilnym
Art. 109 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

"(…) za wnioskiem o przywrócenie terminu nie przemawia okoliczność przekazania pozwanemu błędnej daty doręczenia korespondencji, gdy po stronie pozwanego nie powstała żadna inna wyjątkowa okoliczność, z uwagi na którą czynność nie mogłaby zostać dokonana w terminie."