II K 394/19
AI generated
Court dismisses duplicate criminal proceedings when a prior case against the same person for the same act is already pending.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the criminal proceedings regarding a joint verdict for the defendant T. W. because a prior case concerning the same act and person was already pending. The prosecution argued for the dismissal based on the principle of non-duplication under the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court ruled that since the earlier case (II K 503/19) was already underway, the current proceedings (II K 394/19) must be terminated to prevent duplicate trials.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 17 § 1 pkt 7 k.p.k.; Art. 572 k.p.k.; Art. 632 pkt 2 k.p.k.: Criminal proceedings must be dismissed if a prior proceeding for the same act by the same person is already pending.
Keywords
AI generated
duplicate proceedings
non-duplication principle
criminal procedure code
pending case
termination of proceedings
same person same act
state bears costs
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 17 § 1 pkt 7 k.p.k.
Art. 572 k.p.k.
Art. 632 pkt 2 k.p.k.
art. 17 § 1 pkt 7 k.p.k
art. 572 k.p.k
art. 632 pkt 2 k.p.k