Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 150/20 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; defense's procedural objection to sentencing was rejected as unfounded by the appellate court.

Case Number II Ka 150/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the defense's appeal against the first-instance judgment convicting the defendant of theft. The defense argued that the sentencing violated procedural rules, but the court found no merit in this claim. Consequently, the original verdict was upheld, and the defendant was ordered to pay court costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.; Art. 634 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 627 k.p.k.; Art. 8 ust. 1 pkt 3 w zw. z art. 2 ust. 2 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych: An appeal based on alleged procedural errors that did not affect the substance of the judgment is inadmissible, and the original verdict stands.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal procedural error sentencing review unfounded objection court costs theft conviction appellate court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.
Art. 634 k.p.k.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
Art. 8 ust. 1 pkt 3 w zw. z art. 2 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text