VIII K 99/19
AI generated
Court convicts defendant of robbery with violence and orders full compensation for victim's losses.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of robbery using violence and sentenced him to four years in prison. The defendant admitted guilt but argued for a lighter sentence based on a different statutory qualification, which the court rejected. The court upheld the conviction, the specific penalty, and the obligation to fully compensate the victim for all material losses.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 280 § 2 k.k. w zw. z art. 275 k.k.; Art. 46 § 1 k.k.: Robbery committed with violence constitutes a felony punishable by imprisonment, and the offender is liable to compensate the victim for all resulting material damage.
Keywords
AI generated
robbery with violence
compensation for damage
joint criminal act
imprisonment sentence
procedural costs
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 280 § 2 k.k. w zw. z art. 275 k.k.
Art. 11 § 2 k.k.
Art. 46 § 1 k.k.
Art. 63 § 1 k.k.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
art. 280 § 2 k.k
art. 275 k.k
art. 11 § 2 k.k
art. 275 § 1 k.k
art. 11 § 3 k.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedXII K 157/23
Criminal court convicts defendants of robbery under new law, applies lighter penalty due to retroactive application.
II AKa 136/13
Appeal court reduced robbery sentences and removed knife usage charge due to insufficient evidence and sentencing errors.
II AKa 133/14
Appeal court removes 'dangerous object' charge from kitchen mallet in robbery conviction for three defendants.
VIII K 490/14
Court convicted defendant of theft with recidivism, imposing six years imprisonment and ordering victim compensation.
II Ka 266/14
Court partially allowed appeal by adjusting robbery sentencing amounts and costs based on recidivism.