II K 17/19 AI generated

Court convicted prisoner of insulting psychologist during duty, sentencing 6 months for aggravated insult.

Case Number II K 17/19

Court / Authority Sąd powszechny

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2019-07-08

Outcome Allowed / Granted

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Regional Court in Racibórz convicted the defendant, a prisoner, of insulting a psychologist performing official duties and sentenced him to six months in prison. The court found that the defendant's vulgar and insulting words, delivered during a therapeutic session, violated the protected dignity of the victim while she was fulfilling her professional obligations. The judgment emphasized that the act constituted an aggravated insult under Polish law due to the specific context of the victim's service, warranting a significant punishment despite the defendant's prior record.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 226 § 1 k.k.; Art. 216 k.k.; Art. 64 § 1 k.k.; Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 627 k.p.k. Insulting a public official or person assisting them during official duties constitutes an aggravated insult; the court must assess the severity of the act and the defendant's culpability to determine an appropriate sentence.

Keywords

AI generated

aggravated insult public official prisoner conduct professional duties criminal conviction sentencing guidelines dignity violation

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Art. 226 § 1 k.k.

Art. 216 k.k.

Art. 64 § 1 k.k.

Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.

Art. 627 k.p.k.

§ 17 ust. 1 pkt 2 i ust. 2 pkt 3, § 20 oraz § 4 ust. 3 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 3 października 2016 r. w sprawie ponoszenia przez Skarb Państwa kosztów nieopłaconej pomocy prawnej udzielonej przez adwokata z urzędu

art.226 § 1 k.k

art. 216 k.k

art. 627 k.p.k

art. 624 k.p.k

AI generated

VI Ka 1036/21

Court changes first-instance verdict to clarify statutory elements of child pornography production offense under Polish Criminal Code.

II AKa 6/20

Appeal against conviction for corruption and bribery dismissed due to lack of procedural error affecting the verdict.

IV Ka 584/20

Court dismissed appeal regarding combined sentencing, ruling facts and law application were correct.

II Ka 922/21