Legislator Case Law & Legislation
IV Ua 43/19 AI generated

Charges of insult dismissed because the complaint relies solely on the complainant's subjective assessment of evidence.

Case Number IV Ua 43/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the charges of insult brought against the defendant. The complainant alleged insults based on their own subjective evaluation of the evidence presented, rather than objective facts. The court ruled that criminal charges cannot be founded merely on the complainant's personal interpretation of the evidence without corroborating objective facts.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 234 § 1 k.p.c.: Criminal charges of insult cannot be based solely on the complainant's subjective assessment of evidence; they require objective factual grounds established through proper proof.

Keywords

AI generated
insult charges subjective evidence criminal procedure code complainant assessment objective facts dismissal of charges burden of proof

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.
postawienie zarzutu obrazy art. 233 par.
Art. 234 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

postawienie zarzutu obrazy art. 233 par. 1 kpc nie może polegać na zaprezentowaniu przez skarżącego stanu faktycznego przyjętego przez niego na podstawie własnej oceny dowodów.