Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
IV Ua 40/19 AI generated

Charges of insult dismissed because the complaint relies solely on the complainant's subjective assessment of evidence.

Case Number IV Ua 40/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the charge of insult under Article 233(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The prosecution failed to present objective evidence, relying instead on the complainant's own subjective evaluation of the facts. Consequently, the court ruled that a criminal charge cannot be based merely on the complainant's personal assessment of the evidence presented.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 233 ust. 1 k.p.c.; A criminal charge of insult cannot be founded solely on the complainant's subjective assessment of the evidence without corroborating objective facts.

Keywords

AI generated
charge of insult subjective evidence assessment Code of Criminal Procedure insufficient prosecution criminal liability dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 233 ust. 1 k.p.c.
postawienie zarzutu obrazy art. 233 par.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

postawienie zarzutu obrazy art. 233 par. 1 kpc nie może polegać na zaprezentowaniu przez skarżącego stanu faktycznego przyjętego przez niego na podstawie własnej oceny dowodów.