Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
IV Ua 34/19 AI generated

Charges of insult dismissed when based solely on the complainant's subjective assessment of evidence.

Case Number IV Ua 34/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the charge of insult brought against the defendant. The prosecution attempted to establish the offense by presenting the complainant's factual state derived from their own evaluation of the evidence. The court ruled that such a charge cannot rely on the complainant's subjective perception of facts.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.; The charge of insult cannot be based on the complainant's own subjective assessment of the evidence presented.

Keywords

AI generated
charge of insult subjective evidence assessment procedural law complainant's perception criminal procedure code factual state dismissal of charges

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.
postawienie zarzutu obrazy art. 233 par.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

postawienie zarzutu obrazy art. 233 par. 1 kpc nie może polegać na zaprezentowaniu przez skarżącego stanu faktycznego przyjętego przez niego na podstawie własnej oceny dowodów.