Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
IV Pa 48/19 AI generated

Charges of insult dismissed because the complaint relies solely on the complainant's subjective assessment of evidence.

Case Number IV Pa 48/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the charges of insult brought against the defendant. The prosecution failed to present objective evidence, relying instead on the complainant's subjective evaluation of the facts. Consequently, the court ruled that a criminal charge cannot be based merely on the complainant's personal opinion regarding the evidence presented.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 233 § 2 k.p.c.: A criminal charge of insult cannot be based solely on the complainant's subjective assessment of the facts; the prosecution must present objective evidence to substantiate the accusation.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal procedure charge of insult subjective evidence prosecution burden objective proof complainant assessment dismissal of charges

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.
postawienie zarzutu obrazy art. 233 par.
Art. 233 § 2 k.p.c.
postawienie zarzutu obrazy art. 233 par.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

postawienie zarzutu obrazy art. 233 par. 1 kpc nie może polegać na zaprezentowaniu przez skarżącego stanu faktycznego przyjętego przez niego na podstawie własnej oceny dowodów.