Compensation claim dismissed as farmer not liable for damage caused by farm ownership.

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for compensation arising from the farmer's liability. The plaintiff argued that the farmer was obligated to pay damages for harm caused by the farm's existence, while the defendant contended no such liability existed under the relevant statute. The court ruled that compensation is only due if the farmer is explicitly obligated to pay for damage linked to the farm's possession, a condition not met in this instance.