IV Ka 583/19
AI generated
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance conviction against defendants for procedural errors and factual findings.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court dismissed the appeals filed by the defense counsel for M. B., K. S., and T. P. regarding their convictions. The defense argued that the first-instance judgment violated procedural rules and contained factual errors under Articles 438(2) and 438(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court rejected these claims, finding no impact on the verdict's substance and upholding the original judgment.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.; Art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.: An appeal based on procedural errors or factual mistakes is dismissed if the errors did not influence the content of the judgment.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal appeal
procedural error
factual error
Criminal Procedure Code
judgment validity
defense appeal
appellate review
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.
Art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.
art. 457 § 2 k.p.k
art. 422 § 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 7 k.p.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedII Ka 284/20
Wyrok Sądu Rejonowego w Ostrołęce z dnia 03.08.2020r.
II Ka 44/21
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance sentence for attempted theft as not excessively harsh.
IV Ka 327/23
Appeal dismissed; court upheld acquittal as civil support obligation was established by contract and partial payments.
II Ka 864/23
Court dismissed defense appeal on sentencing, upholding conviction for aggravated assault and rejecting excessive penalty claim.
II Ka 657/20
Criminal appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction for dangerous act using a heavy wooden bench as a weapon.