Court convicts defendant of insulting a public official under Art. 226 § 1 CC and rejects suspended sentence due to recidivism.

The court convicted the defendant of insulting a public official and imposed a three-month prison sentence, explicitly rejecting the request for a suspended sentence. The prosecution argued that the defendant's history of multiple prior convictions, including four for the same offense, demonstrated a high degree of culpability and social danger. Consequently, the court determined that the statutory prerequisites for suspending the execution of the penalty were absent, necessitating immediate execution to achieve the punitive and preventive goals of the law.