Court partially allowed appeal, removing public rights deprivation due to insufficient social condemnation for the crime.

The appellate court partially revoked the first-instance judgment, specifically striking down the deprivation of public rights imposed on the defendants. Although the defendants argued for special condemnation based on the victim's age and the daytime setting, the court found these factors insufficient to justify such a severe penalty. Consequently, the court held that while the behavior was negative, it did not reach the threshold of social outrage required for deprivation of public rights.