II Ka 89/20
AI generated
Appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction for attempted rape and robbery under Polish Criminal Code.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal in Siedlce dismissed the defense's appeal against the first-instance conviction for attempted rape and robbery. The defense argued procedural errors and factual inaccuracies under Articles 438(2) and 438(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, but the appellate court found no grounds to overturn the judgment. Consequently, the original verdict was upheld, and the defendant was ordered to pay court costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438(2) k.p.k.; Art. 438(3) k.p.k.; Art. 634 k.p.k.; Art. 636(1) k.p.k.; Art. 627 k.p.k.; The appellate court may uphold a first-instance judgment if the defense fails to demonstrate that procedural errors or factual mistakes materially affected the outcome.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal appeal
attempted rape
robbery conviction
procedural error
factual error
court costs
upheld verdict
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 438(2) k.p.k.
Art. 438(3) k.p.k.
Art. 634 k.p.k.
Art. 636(1) k.p.k.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
Act of 23 June 1973 on court fees in criminal proceedings
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedII Ka 270/23
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k. – obraza przepisów prawa materialnego w zakresie kwalifikacji prawnej czynu przypisanego oskarżonemu art. 438 pkt 1a k.p.k. – obraza przepisów prawa materialnego w innym wypadku niż wskazany w art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k., chyba że pomimo błędnej podstawy prawnej orzeczenie odpowiada prawu
II AKa 317/20
Wyrok Sądu Okręgowego w Gorzowie Wlkp.
II Ka 185/25
Criminal appeal dismissed; conviction under Art. 178a § 4 kk upheld; costs awarded to state.
IV Ka 550/24
Court dismisses appeal on procedural grounds due to missing evidence and failure to prove factual errors affecting the verdict.
IX Ka 2035/22
Appeal dismissed; court rejected claim of grossly excessive sentence as penalty was not disproportionate.