Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II K 38/14 AI generated

Court convicts briber of active bribery, suspends prison sentence, and corrects fine forfeiture error.

Case Number II K 38/14
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court convicted the defendant of active bribery for offering 200 PLN to police officers to avoid license suspension. While the defendant argued for leniency, the court found aggravating factors like prior convictions and lack of remorse, yet suspended the two-year prison sentence for four years due to confession. The court also corrected a procedural error regarding the forfeiture of seized funds, ruling they were security deposits rather than evidence subject to forfeiture.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 229 § 1, § 3 kk; Art. 69 § 1, § 2 kk; Art. 70 § 1 pkt 1 kk; Art. 71 § 1 kk; Art. 63 § 1 kk; Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.: Active bribery is punishable by imprisonment or a fine, which may be suspended if the offender confesses and shows remorse, while seized funds designated as security deposits do not forfeit to the state.

Keywords

AI generated
active bribery suspended sentence confession mitigation forfeiture error security deposit police corruption conditional probation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 229 § 1, § 3 kk
Art. 69 § 1, § 2 kk
Art. 70 § 1 pkt 1 kk
Art. 71 § 1 kk
Art. 63 § 1 kk
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text