IX Ka 163/14
AI generated
Appeal court partially allowed appeal by removing 'damaging road surface' from offense description due to lack of proof.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appeal court partially modified the first-instance verdict by removing the phrase 'damaging road surface' from the description of the offense. The defendant argued he did not damage the road, but the court held that dragging a log constituted an obstruction under the relevant traffic violation statutes. Consequently, the court upheld the conviction for obstructing traffic while correcting the factual description to reflect only the proven elements of the crime.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 90 kw; Art. 100 pkt 2 kw: The act of dragging a large, unstable object along a public road constitutes an obstruction of traffic regardless of whether actual damage to the road surface is proven.
Keywords
AI generated
obstruction of traffic
public road violation
dragging logs
road surface damage
partial appeal success
traffic offense
factual description correction
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 90 kw
Art. 100 pkt 2 kw
Art. 9 § 1 kw
Art. 24 § 1 i 3 kw
Art. 437 § 2 kpk
Art. 109 § 2 kpw
Art. 624 § 1 kpk
Art. 119 kpw