Court dismissed appeal against traffic violation fine for driving on pedestrian zone, rejecting defendant's excuse of needing to buy medicine.

The appellate court upheld the first-instance judgment convicting the defendant of a traffic violation for driving onto a pedestrian zone. The defendant argued that he was forced to enter the zone to purchase medicine for his sick wife, claiming his earlier statements were unreliable. The court rejected this defense, noting inconsistencies in his story and the fact that he could have walked to the pharmacy, thereby affirming the original conviction and costs.