Court dismissed appeal against conviction for fraud, upholding first-instance judgment on facts and sentencing.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance conviction for fraud under Article 233 of the Criminal Code. The defendant failed to provide evidence contradicting witness testimony regarding a loan contract, despite claiming unawareness of ongoing enforcement proceedings. The court rejected these claims as unverified and noted that enforcement actions were already underway when the loan was signed, rendering the defendant's assertions of ignorance legally irrelevant.