Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
IV P 330/19 AI generated

Court rejects argument that employer's will requires delivery if form differs from written.

Case Number IV P 330/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim regarding the validity of an employer's declaration of will. The plaintiff argued that the Supreme Court's 2007 ruling requires such declarations to be delivered in written form, citing SMS or email as insufficient. The court held that the specific statutory provision in question does not mandate written delivery when the form differs, thereby rejecting the plaintiff's interpretation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 1 ust. 1 Kodeksu cywilnego; Art. 55 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego: A declaration of will by an employer does not require delivery in written form if the form differs, such as via SMS or email.

Keywords

AI generated
declaration of will delivery requirements written form employer obligations civil procedure code supreme court ruling form of communication

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 1 ust. 1 Kodeksu cywilnego
Art. 55 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego

Cited Case Law

AI generated
II PK 178/06
Electronic and postal delivery of identical written termination notice does not violate written form requirement.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Wykładnia przedstawiona w wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 18.01.2007 r. II PK 178/06 może ewentualnie wchodzić tylko wtedy jeżeli pracodawca nie wiązał skutku w postaci złożenia oświadczenia woli z doręczeniem, które miało inną formę niż pisemne (np. sms, e-mail, fax)